Wagatha Christie timeline: How the Rebekah Vardy vs Coleen Rooney libel battle played out

After a week of courtroom drama, the “Wagatha Christie” trial is set to enter its final day.

ere is how the libel row between footballers’ wives Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy reached the High Court in London:

September 2017 to October 2019

The Sun newspaper runs a number of articles about Ms Rooney, including that she travelled to Mexico to look into baby “gender selection” treatment, her plan to revive her TV career and the flooding of her basement.

October 9, 2019

Ms Rooney uses social media to accuse Ms Vardy of selling stories from her private Instagram account to the tabloids.

The wife of former footballer, Wayne Rooney, says she spent five months attempting to work out who was sharing information about her and her family based on posts she had made on her personal social media page.

After sharing a series of “false” stories and using a process of elimination, Ms Rooney claims they were viewed by one Instagram account, belonging to Ms Vardy.

Ms Vardy, then pregnant with her fifth child, denies the allegations and says various people had access to her Instagram over the years.

Video of the Day

She claims to be “so upset” by Ms Rooney’s accusation, later adding: “I thought she was my friend but she completely annihilated me.”

The public dispute makes headlines around the world, with the hashtag #WagathaChristie trending.

Close

Coleen and Wayne Rooney leaving the Royal Courts Of Justice, London, as the high-profile libel battle between Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney continues. Photo: Yui Mok/PA Wire

February 13, 2020

In a tearful appearance on ITV’s Loose Women, Ms Vardy says the stress of the dispute caused her to have severe anxiety attacks and she “ended up in hospital three times”.

Ms Rooney says in a statement that she does not want to “engage in further public debate”.

June 23, 2020

It emerges that Ms Vardy has launched libel proceedings against Ms Rooney.

The Indo Daily: Wagatha Christie – Explosive revelations in the Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy trial


Listen on Apple
Podcasts


Ms Vardy’s lawyers allege she “suffered extreme distress, hurt, anxiety and embarrassment as a result of the publication of the post and the events which followed”.

November 19-20, 2020

The libel battle has its first High Court hearing in London.

A judge rules that Mrs Rooney’s October 2019 post “clearly identified” Ms Vardy as being “guilty of the serious and consistent breach of trust”.

Mr Justice Mark Warby concludes that the “natural and ordinary” meaning of the posts was that Ms Vardy had “regularly and frequently abused her status as a trusted follower of Mrs Rooney’s personal Instagram account by secretly informing The Sun of Mrs Rooney’s private posts and stories”.

February 8-9, 2022

A series of explosive messages between Ms Vardy and her agent Caroline Watt – which Ms Rooney’s lawyers allege were about her – are revealed at a preliminary court hearing.

The court is told Ms Vardy was not referring to Ms Rooney when she called someone a “nasty bitch” in one exchange with Ms Watt.

Ms Rooney’s lawyers seek further information from the WhatsApp messages, but the court is told that Ms Watt’s phone fell into the North Sea after a boat she was on hit a wave, before further information could be extracted from it.

February 14

Ms Rooney is refused permission to bring a High Court claim against Ms Watt for misuse of private information to be heard alongside the libel battle.

A High Court judge, Mrs Justice Karen Steyn, says the bid was brought too late and previous opportunities to make the claim had not been taken.

April 13

Ms Watt is not fit to give oral evidence at the upcoming libel trial, the High Court is told as the case returns for another hearing.

The agent revokes permission for her witness statement to be used, and withdraws her waiver which would have allowed Sun journalists to say whether she was a source of the allegedly leaked stories.

April 29

Ms Vardy “appears to accept” that her agent was the source of allegedly leaked stories, Ms Rooney’s barrister David Sherborne tells the High Court.

He argues that a new witness statement submitted by Ms Vardy suggests Ms Watt was the source but Ms Vardy claims she “did not authorise or condone her”.

Ms Vardy’s lawyer, Hugh Tomlinson, says the statement did not contain “any change whatever in the pleaded case”, with her legal team having no communication with Ms Watt.

May 10-17

Ms Vardy and Ms Rooney come face-to-face in court as the trial of their libel battle takes place at the Royal Courts of Justice in London before Ms Justice Steyn. Both women give evidence, as revelations from the case make daily headlines in the press.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

2,351FansLike
8,555FollowersFollow
12,000FollowersFollow
5,423FollowersFollow
6,364SubscribersSubscribe
- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest Articles